0.03/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 960 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:34:06 EDT 2022 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # post_as_ho12 with pid 27856 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by post_as_ho12 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 65s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 27864 completed with status 0 0.21/0.49 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HGHSF-FFSF00-SSSFFSBN 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.21/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 65s (1) cores 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # Proof found! 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_22, type, c: $i). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_23, type, b: $i). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_24, type, a: $i). 0.21/0.49 thf(decl_25, type, c_less_: $i > $i > $o). 0.21/0.49 thf(cBLEDSOE4_W_AX, conjecture, (![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((c_less_ @ X1 @ X2)=>((X1)!=(X2))))=>(?[X3:$i > $o]:(((~((X3 @ a))&(X3 @ b))&~((X3 @ c))))<=((c_less_ @ b @ c)&(c_less_ @ a @ b)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBLEDSOE4_W_AX)). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((c_less_ @ X1 @ X2)=>((X1)!=(X2))))=>(((c_less_ @ b @ c)&(c_less_ @ a @ b))=>?[X3:$i > $o]:(((~(X3 @ a)&(X3 @ b))&~(X3 @ c)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBLEDSOE4_W_AX])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X8:$i, X9:$i > $o]:(((~(c_less_ @ X7 @ X8)|((X7)!=(X8)))&(((c_less_ @ b @ c)&(c_less_ @ a @ b))&((X9 @ a)|~(X9 @ b)|(X9 @ c))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ a)|(X3 @ c)|~((X3 @ b)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~((c_less_ @ X1 @ X2))|((X1)!=(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (c_less_ @ a @ b), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((a)=(b))|((c)=(b))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_3])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((c_less_ @ X1 @ X1))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (c_less_ @ b @ c), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((c)=(b)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_7])). 0.21/0.49 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_7]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.49 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 8 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 14 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 14 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 6 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 8 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 4 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 3 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 10 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 14 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 452 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1604 pages 0.21/0.49 0.21/0.49 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages 0.21/0.49 EOF